An end of the rule of law would mean the end of Europe, Luxembourg’s Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn warned on Tuesday, days before EU leaders are set to discuss a deepening dispute over the rule of law in Poland at a summit in Brussels.
“Europe will not digest the end of the rule of law. Europe will die from such a development… Europe has been built on democracy, liberty, respect – and the rule of law,” Asselborn told reporters before a meeting of EU European affairs ministers in Luxembourg.
“We have to realise this, not only the members that respect the rule of law but also in places where the thinking is that the rule of law is not that important.
“If you challenge the rule of law, you do it for a reason. And this reason is the retention of power.”
The warning comes as the European Commission’s chief executive warned Poland on Tuesday that its challenge to the supremacy of European Union law called into question the very foundations of the 27-nation bloc and could not go unpunished.
Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal ruled last week that parts of EU law are incompatible with the Polish constitution, undermining the legal pillar on which the union stands and raising fears that Poland could eventually leave the bloc.
Poland’s ruling nationalist Law and Justice party says it has no plans for a “Polexit” and – unlike Britain before its Brexit referendum in 2016 – popular support for membership of the EU remains high in Poland.
Nevertheless, other member states have been dismayed by Warsaw’s defiance of the EU, including Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki’s complaint in a letter on Monday of mission creep that he warned would lead to a “centrally managed organism, governed by institutions deprived of democratic control”.
Speaking ahead of Morawiecki in a debate on the row in the EU’s parliament in Strasbourg on Tuesday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen laid out three options for a response to the Polish court’s attack on the primacy of EU law.
“The European Commission is, at the moment, carefully assessing this judgment. But I can already tell you: I am deeply concerned,” she said. “This ruling calls into question the foundations of the European Union. It is a direct challenge to the unity of the European legal order.”
She said a first option is so-called infringements, where the European Commission legally challenges the Polish court’s judgment, which could lead to fines.
Another option is a conditionality mechanism and other financial tools whereby EU funds would be withheld from Poland.
Until Warsaw’s clash with Brussels is resolved, it is unlikely to see any of the 23.9 billion euros in grants and 12.1 billion in cheap loans that it applied for as part of the EU’s recovery fund after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Biden sends new Brexit warning over Article 16 threat for hated deal [LIVE BLOG]
Same reasons UK wanted out! Verhofstadt likens Poland row to Brexit [VIDEO]
Trade war would blow huge hole in EU as £250BN in UK sales at risk [ANALYSIS]
The EU could even block Polish access to EU grants for development and structural projects in the 2021-2027 budget worth around 70 billion euros.
Von der Leyen said a third option is the application of Article 7 of the EU’s treaties. Under this, rights of member states – including the right to vote on EU decisions – can be suspended because they have breached core values of the bloc.
Morawiecki, speaking next in the EU assembly, accused the bloc of overstepping its authority.
“EU competencies have clear boundaries, we must not remain silent when those boundaries are breached. So we are saying yes to European universalism, but we say no to European centralism,” he said.
A succession of members of the parliament then stood up to castigate the Polish leader, while other EU ministers gathering in Luxembourg joined the chorus of criticism.
Finland’s minister for European affairs said a compromise could not be the solution and the European Commission must act.
“We do not want to escort anyone out,” Tytti Tuppurainen told reporters.
“We respect the wish of the Polish people to be inside the EU and continue as members of the EU, but we will not compromise the value base of the EU.”